In this article, you’ll see how the Russell 2000 has performed over the last 1, 3, 5, 10, 20 years, and since the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) inception in the year 2000.
Over the last 20 years, the Russell 2000 has underperformed the S&P 500 returns and Nasdaq 100 returns by a significant margin.
Average returns can be deceiving because they hide the big up and down years that make up the average. Therefore, below you’ll also learn what the biggest up and down years have been, in percentage terms.
The Russell 2000 is an index composed of US-based small capitalization stocks. It is the 2000 smallest capitalization stocks in the Russell 3000 index. The Russell 3000 is the largest 3000 companies in the US, so by extension, you could think of the Russell 2000 index as the 2000 smallest companies in the top 3000.
The Russell 2000 index was launched in 1984. The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM), which tracks the Russell 2000 index, was launched May 22, 2000.
Here’s a video that discusses the major statistics and how IWM and the Russell 2000 compare to the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 in terms of performance.
Average Russell 2000 Returns Based on IWM
Here are the annualized returns for the Russell 2000 index for the last 20, 10, 5, 3, and 1 years. Statistics are based on the IWM ETF which has a 0.19% yearly expense ratio, so the actual index returns will be slightly higher (but you can’t invest in the index without incurring fees, so these are the returns you would have actually received).
Years Averaged (as of March 21, 2025) | Russell 2000 Annualized Return Per Year (with dividends) | Russell Annualized Return Per Year (no dividends) |
24.8 Years (since May 2000 IWM inception) | 7.23% | 6.01% |
20 years | 7.6% | 6.16% |
10 years | 6.42% | 4.99% |
5 years | 15.61% | 11.63% |
3 years | 1.09% | -0.34% |
1 year | 3.18% | 1.76% |
Returns have been calculated based on Tradingview charts.
Everyone should passively invest some funds. Set it and forget it for 10 years or more to compound your wealth.
The Passive Stock Investing Using ETFs eBook lays out how to do it, including how to capitalize on the long-term upward trajectory of index funds.
Making 7.5% per year, which is close to what the Russell 2000 has averaged over the last 20 years, produces a $707,946 nest egg if investing $10K and adding $500 each month for 30 years. Invest $190,000 total, over 30 years, to make $708k. That’s the power of compounding.
For reference, investing in the S&P 500 with its higher average yearly return of 10.5% (over the last 100 years) would produce a $1.285 million nest egg based on the same contributions.
That’s passively investing, not trading, and just adding a bit more to the position each month. You can use the investment calculator on Investor.gov to test out different scenarios. Note that returns may be higher or lower in the future.
The Biggest Up and Down Years for the Russell 2000
Many of the biggest up and down years occurred around the tech bubble of 2000, and the financial crisis of 2008. Returns include dividends.
Dates and returns prior to 2001 are based on the Russell 2000 index and not IWM (and thus don’t include dividends).
Biggest Russell 2000 Index Down Years
2008: -34.15%
1990: -21.46%
2022: -20.48%
2002: -20.37%
2018: -11.11%
Biggest Russell 2000 Index Up Years
2003: 47.58%
1991: 43.68%
2013: 38.69%
2009: 28.51%
2010: 26.93%
1995: 26.21%
2019: 25.39%
1988: 22.38%
2016: 21.6%
1997: 20.52%
2020: 20.03%
Trades that last a few weeks to a few months more your style? The Complete Method Stock Swing Trading Course shows you how to find explosive stocks that often rally 20% or more within a few weeks of entry.
Russell 2000 Returns by Year
The following are the Russell 2000 returns by year based on the IWM ETF.
2025 (so far): -7.81%
2024: 9.96%
2023: 16.83%
2022: -20.48%
2021: 14.54%
2020: 20.03%
2019: 25.39%
2018: -11.12%
2017: 14.58%
2016: 21.59%
2015: -4.48%
2014: 5.04%
2013: 38.7%
2012: 16.7%
2011: -4.43%
2010: 26.92%
2009: 28.49%
2008: -34.16%
2007: -1.76%
2006: 18.27%
2005: 4.23%
2004: 17.46%
2003: 46.87%
2002: -20.85%
2001: 1.2%
The Russell 2000 returns below, for the year 2000 and prior, are based on the Russell 2000 index and thus don’t account for dividends.
2000: -4.2%
1999: 19.6%
1998: -3.5%
1997: 20.5%
1996: 14.8%
1995: 26.2%
1994: -3.2%
1993: 17%
1992: 16.4%
1991: 43.7%
1990: -21.5%
1989: 14.2%
1988: 22.38%
Russell 2000 Historical Chart with Rally and Decline Percentages
The Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) began trading in 2000. The following chart shows the journey the index/ETF has taken since, including rallies and declines of more than 30% (peak to trough) over that time.
The chart is based on monthly data points. If using a shorter time frame, such as daily, there are many more 30% drops and rallies, but this chart shows the overall moves and their ultimate percentages.
The chart is logarithmic.

Lowest Fee Russell 2000 ETFs
The easiest way to invest in the Russell 2000 is to use an exchange traded fund (ETF). You buy and sell it like an individual stock, and the managers of the ETF make sure the fund tracks the index by buying the same stocks that are included in the Russell 2000.
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) – a popular choice with the highest average daily volume of Russell 2000 ETFs and a 0.19% expense ratio per year.
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund (VTWO) – A lower fee option for longer-term investors. VTWO does about 10% of the daily volume of IWM, which is still ample volume, and has a 0.07% expense ratio. It has performed just a tiny bit better over the long term than IWM because of the lower expense ratio.
An expense ratio is the cost of managing the fund, or your cost of investing in it. So if the Russell 2000 returned 10% in a year, with a 0.2% expense ratio, your return as an investor would be 9.8%.
For Canadian investors looking to invest in the Russell 2000 via a Canadian ETF (that you buy in Canadian dollars), the iShares US Small Cap ETF CAD-Hedged (TSX: XSU) is a solid choice. It hedges the US dollar exposure, so the return is more similar to the Russell 2000 (which is priced in US dollars) since currency fluctuations have less effect on the overall return. It has a 0.35% expense ratio.
By Cory Mitchell, CMT
Disclaimer: Nothing in this article is personal investment advice, or advice to buy or sell anything. Trading is risky and can result in substantial losses, even more than deposited if using leverage. This site has affiliate links.
Leave a Reply
Leave a well-reasoned comment or question.